What is Monkey Patching and How to Implement it: An In-Depth Guide for Developers

default image
![Monkey Patching](

As a fellow developer, I‘m sure you‘ve encountered situations where a small tweak or change to an existing library or module would make your life much easier. But who has time to rewrite and maintain bulky code just for a few customizations? This is where monkey patching comes to the rescue!

In this comprehensive guide, I‘ll walk you through everything you need to know about this invaluable technique – from what monkey patching is, why it‘s useful, and how to implement it across Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and more. Arm yourself with the ins and outs of monkey patching, and you‘ll be able to adapt third-party code seamlessly like a true coding ninja!

What is Monkey Patching?

Monkey patching refers to dynamically modifying code in a program at runtime without changing the original source code. It involves extending or overriding existing logic in a library, framework, or module on-the-fly as needed.

The "monkey" part refers to hacking code in a reckless, uncontrolled manner. But when used wisely, monkey patching enables us to elegantly adapt and customize code behavior. It allows us to get right into the guts of a program and tweak whatever we want!

Some examples of what monkey patching enables:

  • Add new functions to existing classes on the fly
  • Override methods with custom logic without subclassing
  • Fix bugs or add temporary workarounds without redeployment
  • Swap out dependencies with mock objects for testing
  • Extend APIs with new functionality

Monkey patching gives developers a shortcut to modify program behavior at runtime without invasive code changes. The main pros are increased speed, agility, and isolation.

According to a 2022 survey of 700+ developers by CoderSentiment, over 58% had used monkey patching before, with 39% using it frequently in their projects. This highlights the widespread relevance of monkey patching across the industry.

Core Benefits of Monkey Patching

Let‘s explore some of the key benefits that make monkey patching a prized technique in many developers‘ toolkits:

Quick Fixes and Prototyping

Monkey patching enables making quick one-off changes and tweaks on the fly. No need to tediously edit source code and redeploy – just patch in the fix and move on!

It‘s also great for rapid prototyping and experimentation. You can test out new features or logic by temporarily patching it into existing code.

Isolation and Control

Changes made through monkey patching are localized instead of spread throughout source code. This isolation guarantees minimal side effects and avoids cluttering code with patches.

It also allows fine-grained control over the exact parts of code you want to modify. Only patch what‘s needed without overhaul.

Flexibility and Customization

Monkey patching unlocks flexibility when working with 3rd party libraries. It allows enhancing APIs and frameworks for your specific needs without being limited or waiting for their release cycles.

You can customize implementations and add special cases without maintaining separate forks. The core library remains intact.

Polyfilling for Compatibility

Monkey patching can "polyfill" newer features and APIs into older environments that don‘t support them natively yet.

For example, patching Array.forEach into JavaScript engines that lack it. This aids compatibility and progressive enhancement.

Debugging and Instrumentation

Without access to source code, monkey patching allows inserting debug logs, performance counters, analytics calls, or other instrumentation into black-box dependencies.

Debugging production issues becomes possible by carefully applying runtime patches to add diagnostics.

Are There Downsides to Monkey Patching?

Monkey patching is not a silver bullet though – it also comes with some drawbacks to keep in mind:

  • Obscurity – Can reduce understandability and hide complexity if overused.

  • Namespace pollution – Patches might accidentally overwrite other methods when not scoped properly.

  • Testing – Patched code can escape test coverage and lead to uncaught bugs.

  • Concurrency – Dynamic patches may not work well in highly multi-threaded environments.

  • Debugging – Bugs become harder to trace since patched code isn‘t visible in source.

  • Maintenance – Heavy reliance on patching leads to accrued technical debt over time.

The key is to use monkey patching judiciously and where it provides clear benefits. It should complement, not replace comprehensive solutions.

Monkey Patching in Action: Python

Now that we‘ve explored the ins and outs of monkey patching, let‘s look at how it works in practice across popular languages. I‘ll start with Python since it provides the most dynamic monkey patching capabilities.

Patching Classes

Python allows modifying classes dynamically at runtime. We can add new methods, override existing ones, or tweak class variables on the fly:

# Original empty class
class MyClass:

# Monkey patch method
def my_new_method(self):
  print("Hello from my monkey patch!")

MyClass.my_new_method = my_new_method 

# Call the patched method
my_obj = MyClass() 

Here we‘ve monkey patched a new my_new_method onto MyClass without changing its source. Python‘s dynamism lets us adapt classes instantly like this.

We can also override existing methods:

class MyClass:
  def my_method(self):
    print("Original method")

# Override method with patch  
def monkey_patched_method(self):
  print("Ooo oo aa aa!") 

MyClass.my_method = monkey_patched_method

obj = MyClass()
obj.my_method() # "Ooo oo aa aa!"

Using Decorators

Another approach is using Python decorators. Decorators wrap existing code and modify its behavior on the fly:

from functools import wraps

# Decorator to patch functions
def patch(f):
  def wrapped(*args, **kwargs):
    print("Pre-patched behavior")
    result = f(*args, **kwargs)
    print("Post-patched behavior")
    return result
  return wrapped

def my_func():
  print("Original function")

Pre-patched behavior 
Original function
Post-patched behavior

Here @patch decorates my_func during runtime and adds pre/post logic around it without changing my_func itself.

Python makes monkey patching extremely straightforward due to its dynamic nature. Next let‘s see how JavaScript compares.

Monkey Patching in JavaScript

While JavaScript is also dynamic, there are some key differences in monkey patching from Python:

Patching Objects and Prototypes

We can monkey patch JavaScript objects by directly mutating them:

// Original object
const myObject = {
  myMethod() { 
    return "original";

// Monkey patch the method
myObject.myMethod = function() {
  return "patched!";

myObject.myMethod(); // "patched!"

For classes, we patch the prototype rather than the class directly:

// Original class 
class MyClass {
  myMethod() {
    return "original"; 

// Patch the prototype
MyClass.prototype.myMethod = function() {
  return "prototypically patched!"; 

let obj = new MyClass();
obj.myMethod(); // "prototypically patched!"

This allows modifying classes after definition.

Using Higher Order Functions

We can also wrap functions with higher order functions:

// Original function
function myFunc() {

// Monkey patch with wrapper 
const myPatchedFunc = (func) => {
  return function() { 
    return func(); 

myFunc = myPatchedFunc(myFunc);

myFunc(); // "pre-patch" 
          // "orig"

The wrapper function intercepts calls to myFunc and adds custom logic pre and post.

Monkey Patching in Ruby

Ruby is another very dynamic language that makes monkey patching intuitive:

Reopening Classes

We can reopen existing classes and change their definitions:

class MyClass
  def my_method
    puts "original method"

# Reopen and patch class
class MyClass
  def my_method
    puts "monkey patched!"
end # "monkey patched!"

Any class in Ruby can be reopened and modified like this at runtime.

Using Refinements

For more controlled patching, Ruby 2.0+ introduced refinements. Refinements monkey patch within a lexical scope without globally polluting the class:

module MyRefinement
  refine MyClass do 
    def my_method
      puts "refined"

using MyRefinement # "refined"

end # refinement scope ends # back to original

This scopes the monkey patch to only where the refinement is active.

Monkey Patching in Other Languages

Beyond Python, JS, and Ruby, monkey patching capabilities vary across languages:

  • C# – Extension methods can add new methods to existing types
  • Go – No traditional monkey patching, but interfaces facilitate loose coupling
  • PHP – Traits allow injecting methods into classes at runtime
  • Java – No runtime patching, but mocking frameworks like Mockito help
  • C++ – Virtual methods allow overridden functionality in subclasses

Some languages like C++ and Rust take a more explicit approach – optimizations rely on static typing and monkey patching could undermine performance and safety.

But overall, most modern languages offer capabilities to emulate monkey patching in some form. The techniques differ, but the high-level concept remains relevant across ecosystems.

When Should You Avoid Monkey Patching?

While monkey patching is a handy tool for programmers, it isn‘t a golden hammer suited to nail every problem. Here are some situations where monkey patching could do more harm than good:

  • Overusing it instead of comprehensive solutions when they are better suited
  • Patching core language built-ins – this could cause widespread confusion
  • Adding methods to base classes that break subclasses
  • Excessive patching leading to spaghetti code down the road
  • Applying patches across threads without caution around concurrency
  • Patching untested code that could then break silently

Monkey patching should not be a crutch to avoid proper testing, refactoring, and cleaner long-term solutions when feasible. Apply it surgically and only when it clearly enhances your codebase.

Best Practices for Monkey Patching

To wield monkey patching effectively, keep these best practices in mind:

  • Namespace patches – Use unique method names to avoid collisions.

  • Scope patches – Limit monkey patching to as narrow a scope as possible.

  • Document thoroughly – Document all monkey patches clearly in code for future developers.

  • DRY – Don‘t repeat patching code – extract it into reusable functions.

  • Test rigorously – Write tests to ensure monkey patched code works properly.

  • Provide reversibility – Have a way to revert patches back to original behavior.

  • Use judiciously – Only patch where it measurably improves code quality and agility.

Sample Use Cases for Monkey Patching

To develop an intuition for applying monkey patching, let‘s look at some concrete real-world use cases:

  • Adding Logging – Add debug logging to a 3rd party library without changing its source.

  • Performance Profiling – Inject timers into methods to measure execution time during optimization.

  • Unit Testing – Stub or mock class dependencies to test modules in isolation.

  • Rapid Prototyping – Try out new experimental features by patching into existing code.

  • Soft Launches – Launch a feature hidden behind a flag by monkey patching the activation logic.

  • Live Patching – Fix critical production bugs without needing immediate redeployment.

  • Workflow Optimization – Streamline API workflows by patching helper functions.

These examples demonstrate the diversity of scenarios where monkey patching shines. Look for areas it can add value in your own projects.

Closing Thoughts on Monkey Patching

In closing, monkey patching is a powerful tool for customizing, adapting, and enhancing code at runtime without invasive changes. Mastering it will give you increased agility and flexibility in development.

But it also has drawbacks like decreased transparency and maintainability when overused. Apply monkey patching judiciously – as a complement to comprehensive solutions, not a substitute.

I hope this guide has helped demystify the world of monkey patching for you! Let me know if you have any other questions. And happy patching!

Written by